The Ugly Face Of Plagiarism
Guest Post by Zainub from Karachi Metblogs
The Internet is such diverse and easy to use medium it expands our horizons for communication like few other mediums in the history of mankind have. The effect this has had on the publication industry in particular is worth looking at. While on one hand it has given every and anybody a means to become a publisher (it takes less then five minutes to start your own blog), on the other hand, this mass ameuterization of publishing has virtually opened the floodgates for one of the industry’s biggest evils – plagiarism. A few days back here at the Karachi Metroblog it self we joyfully disclosed the newest edition of WeCite, a fairly new and on the face exciting ezine (online magazine for those who’re not familiar with the term), that represented to us, the changing face of journalism. The rise of “new media” as its called. But alas, things weren’t to be this rosy.
One of our readers, Salman, initially pointed us to the possibility of one of their articles being plagiarised, and later confirmed this him self by contacting the original author of the article, who verified the article was indeed copied. The same day, I send a stern email to their editorial team, demanding attribution for two of my images (this and this) that they had used in one of their articles (see this). And despite apologies, both in the comments section here, and via email, which reassured me, that the images would be attributed and re-licensed as necessary “as soon as possible” three days went by and nothing was done.
It was not out of quest for publicity that I demanded proper attribution. Most images on Flickr, from where they lifted my images too, are either all rights reserved, or some rights reserved, under Creative Commons Licenses. The license I used (CC Share-Alike Attribution 2.0) allowed reuse, adapting and distribution, under the condition of proper attribution and re-licensing under the same license under which the image was first uploaded. Any use of the images that does not fulfill this criterion was illegal. It was a matter of principle, and I expected, that an ezine that was seemingly proud of its open-mindedness and liberality, would respect and abide by laws, that it would know better then the ordinary Joe on the street what copyright was and why it was important.
It was this frustration that led me last night to dig deeper into the matter. I initially discovered that the article they had used my images for, was it self an adapted version of an article that appeared in The Hindustan Times, but as I searched more, using Copyscape, a fantastic plagiarism-detecting search engine, the research presented some shocking discoveries. Out of a total of 27 articles published in this month’s issue, at least 11 were plagiarised, either exact copies of other articles on the web, or with major chunks copied from other sources. Vis-a-Vis and Slant Magazine in particular faced the brunt of the copy-attacks, with 5 and 2 of their articles respectively being copied word for word.
Other content was lifted from Rediff News, Blogcritics, and even random blogs of ordinary people, like Jtom’s In The Family House, were not spared. And if you thought it was merely the staff and guest writers that were deceiving and misleading their editorial team, let me tell you that everyone from the editor in chief, to the associate and executive editor, had at least one plagiarised article under their names.
Hastily I send emails to many of the authors whose work had been copied, not surprisingly, some of them are now responding back saying their attempts to get in touch with the magazine staff is resulting in bounced back emails. Indeed much of their website is now becoming inaccessible, with “server upgrade” maintenance messages coming up with apologies. Urooj Zia, fellow Karachi metroblogger and one of the guest writers there, has expressed her disbelief and asked her article to be removed from their website. Urooj’s article was one of only 16 articles in the magazine which was original.
In a society where piracy and copyright infringement are viewed as an acceptable practice, an invariable product of inflation and where leading daily broadsheets, names like Dawn and The News, occasionally don’t mind lifting copyright content from the web and incorporating it in their owns publications without attribution, it is perhaps not entirely surprising that a budding ezine should also resort to such tactics. But it is the extent to which they have plagiarised is what is truly shocking. It shows how deeply ingrained indifference, cheating and dishonesty are in our society.
Below you’ll find a complete list of all their plagiarised articles along with links to the original authors they were copied from. As attempts to get in touch with WeCite keep resulting in futility, I urge you to publicize this issue your self as much as you can. Plagiarism is a hideous crime and it should be not condoned at any level. Perhaps, if we, the readers, show a strong response to it this time, it will send a strong warning to all those out there to guard against it heavily in the future. And whilst you’re at it, don’t forget to check out Copyscape and put some of their banners on your blog or website. And you might as well check if your own content hasn’t been copied by someone else too, in this day and age, you never know.
9. 300: This is Sparta -By Omar Saleem & Miss WeCite
One huge chunk copied from: 300 – the movie – “guy flick” – from a chick’s perspective -By Jtom, In The Family House
10. Those bonds -By Ayesha Fazli
Copied from: FEMALE FELLOWSHIP: A Celebration Of The Bonds That Exist Among Girlfriends -By Sala Elise Patterson, Vis-a-Vis Magazine
11.Till Death Do Us Part: Is monogamy more prevalent than we thing? -By Christina Anderson
Copied from: TILL DEATH OF LOVE DO US PART: Musings On Monogamy, By Shashoua, Vis-a-Vis Magazine